Site Loader
Order Essay
111 Town Square Pl, Jersey City, NJ 07310, U.S.
111 Town Square Pl, Jersey City, NJ 07310, U.S.

The Battle of the Ia Drang Valley was truly a learning point and could be construed as a lesson in what not to do and as such provided many points and lessons to be learned from and not to repeat in future battles. The Battle of the Ia Drang valley would be the first major battle between the United States military and the North Vietnamese Army during the Vietnam War. The major players on the ground during the battle for the United States consisted of the 1st and 2nd Battalion of the 7th Cavalry and the 2nd Battalion of the 5th Cavalry, versus seven battalions from both the 33rd and 66th Regiments of the North Vietnamese Army. The Battle of the Ia Drang Valley was to be a proof of concept of sorts for the United States strategy of utilizing kill ratios to determine the outcome of a battle as a victory or as a loss. The battle also served to firmly cement the use of helicopters in Air Assault operations for the duration of the Vietnam War, and for any and all of the future conflicts to date that United States military would take any part in.
The Battle of the Ia Drang Valley valuable lessons learned
The Battle of the Ia Drang Valley was an example of two vastly different forces, one with superior technology and nearly unlimited resources, and one with very low technology and one with limited resources but very determined enemy. Both forces shared a mutual goal, to close with and destroy the enemy. A critical error that the battle served to highlight was the need for clearer and more concise intelligence to enable Commanders to establish a clear picture of the Operational Environment. From the onset of the battle US Commanders were not fully aware of the size, strength and the current capabilities of enemy forces arrayed in the engagement area. The first units to land on LZ X-ray or later at LZ Albany were not completely aware of the forces that were assembled as an opposing force to resist the landings.
A second error that was identified was the very hasty planning timeline in regards to establishing an additional landing zone identified as LZ Albany. The entire operations process to issuing the orders was extremely short, less than two hours. Which again did little to nothing to aid subordinates in fully developing primary, secondary and tertiary plans for actions on contact. This limited planning time also did not allow for additional requests for information that could have served to identify the intelligence shortfalls such as enemy troop strength and disposition.
A third major error was the inability to transport and land all cavalry troopers in one air lift. This error was attributable to two factors. Factor one was the force lacked the adequate number of helicopters needed to conduct a single air lift operation. Factor two, LZ X-ray the primary landing zone was not adequately sized to accommodate the number of helicopters needed to execute a single air lift regardless if they had been available. To add to these problems, flight time to and from the landing zone back to the operating bases and back. The flight time was roughly 30 minutes back to base and 30 minutes back to LZ X-Ray. Making it a one hour round trip at a minimum, and only if everything went perfectly right without a single hang up. This flight time dramatically impacted the combat power that could be brought to bear on the enemy very early on and throughout the battle. Another large problem that the flight time and the lack of total number of helicopters available played in was the resupplying of ammunition, water, medical supplies, and lastly the evacuation of the critically wounded Soldiers. These challenges led to the entire battalion to not be in place on LZ X-Ray until approximately five hours had passed from the initial landings.
One positive insight that was gained during the battle that ensued for LZ X-Ray, was by utilizing accurate and superior artillery fire support and close air support, the smaller force of embattled United States Soldiers were able to seize and retain the landing zone from a numerically superior North Vietnamese Army force. The American forces were effectively facing two to one odds against them. The North Vietnamese Army had established an area of operations that included LZ X-Ray area immediately surrounding landing zone. The North Vietnamese Army also had more than adequate time to plan and prepare this area to better suit their tactical benefit. The North Vietnamese Army commanders understood that the United States artillery and fire support was vastly superior to their own, which lead them to the decision, to attempt to close the distance to the United States Army units on the landing zone. This tactic of closing with the US Soldiers could only work if the North Vietnamese Army could break through the American lines and intermingle with the United States Soldiers, which would preclude the use of the United States superior artillery against them and render it ineffective and useless. This North Vietnamese tactic, however was thwarted by the United States forces who utilized effective close air support in the defense of the American lines. The close air support was able to suppress the enemy and prevent them from closing the distance to break through the American lines thus enabling the continuous artillery fire support which was to prove crucial to the Americans offensive and defensive operations
A second positive take away from the Battle of the Ia Drang Valley, was the immediate if not almost instantaneous establishment a unity of command. This unity of command manifested itself in by placing the Battalion commander on the ground in charge of all initial forces who were on or immediately around LZ X-Ray. This command authority also continued to extend to any unit that was moved onto LZ X-Ray as a reinforcing unit. An additional benefit of this unity of command was that the Battalion Commander on the ground only answered to his immediate Brigade commander. This command relationship enabled the Battalion Commander to receive situation updates and rapidly disseminate his orders to the units that were subordinate to his command, this relationship vastly decreased the lag time between making decisions and the follow on actions during the battle. This command relationship was in part directly responsible for the overall United States victory in the Battle of the Ia Drang valley.
Despite the numerous errors that were identified throughout the battle, the mission was deemed a success. The Army as always was able to adapt to the challenges this battle highlighted. These changes directly impacted not only the forces operating in the South East Asia during this time period, but also the changes impacted all of the United States military for decades to come to include our current conflicts.

Post Author: admin

x

Hi!
I'm Elizabeth!

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out